E-Bike Safety Strategy

Keeping E-Biking Safe In Colorado

E-bike use has increased dramatically in Colorado since we became the fourth state in the country to adopt the three-class e-bike system in 2017. Since then, academic research and input from our supporters make clear that e-bikes have delivered significant health, climate, and economic benefits to communities across Colorado and the country. Countless riders of all ages and physical abilities tell us their e-bikes have led them to bike again, or more often, for recreation and everyday trips. 

As more people ride e-bikes, and as more people ride other high-powered electric devices, including some that resemble e-bikes, safety concerns have increased. These safety concerns are legitimate. 

Our team is working to address these concerns without restricting access to legal e-bikes or diminishing the many benefits they provide. More specifically, we want to avoid state laws and local policies that dramatically restrict access to e-bikes for all riders, as we unfortunately saw recently in New Jersey.

Our 2026-2027 E-bike Safety Strategy plan is designed to address the safety concerns associated with e-bikes and other high-powered devices. This plan will evolve as we learn what works and community needs change.

Last updated October 26, 2026.

Woman on e-bike

The Plan At A Glance

Key Assumptions

  • Class 1, 2, and 3 e-bikes have brought numerous benefits to Colorado; our work to improve safety should not undermine these benefits.
  • Not everyone riding class 1, 2, and 3 e-bikes does so responsibly; however, people riding illegal high-powered electric devices, commonly called “e-motos,” are having a disproportionate negative impact on safety.
  • Addressing the “e-moto” problem is a top priority.

2026-2027 E-Bike Safety Strategy

Improving safety will require multiple strategies and a collaborative, community-wide effort involving local businesses, schools, non-profits, and government. Bicycle Colorado is well positioned to lead statewide policies and programs and support and amplify local efforts.

Pass State Laws and Local Policies

Strategy 1: Pass one or more state laws that crack down on the illegal operation of “e-motos” and that promote safe e-biking. 

Strategy 2: Support local governments that are adopting safety ordinances.

Disseminate Knowledge

Strategy 1: Create a self-directed, no-cost digital e-bike safety course available to the public.

Strategy 2: Curate the highest quality public service announcement materials and share them with communities in Colorado. Collaborate with other organizations to create and distribute these materials. 

Strategy 3: Continue hosting virtual public webinars to discuss progress implementing this plan and lessons learned in Colorado and other states. 

Strategy 4: Continue hosting virtual meetings with local Colorado safe streets advocacy groups to discuss the progress implementing this plan and share best practices.

Hold People Accountable

Strategy 1: Collaborate with the Colorado Attorney General to enforce House Bill 25-1197, which makes it illegal for brands and retailers to market “e-motos” as e-bikes. 

Strategy 2: Support law enforcement and other organizations by sharing proven tactics to hold people accountable for riding illegal devices, riding devices where prohibited, or violating traffic laws.

Woman on e-bike
Senior e-bike riders stand with their bikes.
Kid on the back of an e-bike

The "E-Moto" Problem

After studying safety concerns, we identified three main forces contributing to safety concerns:

People are riding devices they should not.

Examples:

  • A rider operating a high-powered “e-moto” on public streets without a license and registration.
  • Not every child has the strength, skills, or maturity to handle an e-bike safely, but some parents allow them to ride anyway.
Electric motorcycle

People are riding devices in prohibited areas.

Examples:

  • An individual operating a high-powered device such as an “e-moto” on a multi-use path or road.
  • An individual operating a class 3 e-bike on a multi-use path, which many communities prohibit.

People’s riding behaviors violate the law.

Examples:

  • A person riding recklessly on an “e-moto” and running a red light. 
  • A bicyclist violating the speed limit on a multi-use path.


We most often hear a scenario involving all three drivers: a teenager riding an “e-moto” on a multi-use path and traveling above the posted speed limit. 

Of these drivers, people riding high-powered electric devices commonly called “e-motos” pose a much greater safety risk than people riding legal class 1, 2, or 3 e-bikes.

What Is An "E-Moto"?

Characteristics of an “e-moto” include:

  • Does not comply with the three-class e-bike system because the motor is too powerful or the top speed exceeds that of a legal e-bike.
  • Can be operated only on private property unless the vehicle meets licensure and registration requirements. In other words, they should not be operated on public roads, bike lanes, sidewalks, pedestrian and bicycle paths, or trails.
  • They are not low-powered scooters or motorcycles. Under Colorado statute, low-powered scooters and motorcycles must be registered and insured and operated by someone with a valid driver’s license. 
  • They are sometimes similar to off-highway vehicles or toy vehicles.
  • Unlike toy vehicles, electric scooters, bicycles, e-bicycles, low-powered scooters, off-highway vehicles, and motorcycles, “e-motos” are not defined in Colorado law.

See Appendix A for statutory definitions of class 1, 2, and 3 e-bikes. See Appendix B for statutory definitions of other devices

Root Causes

To design effective solutions, we needed to understand the root causes, so we asked, “Why?”—for example, why are some teenagers riding “e-motos” on multi-use paths and traveling at excessive speeds? Below are the top root causes we identified:

 

  1. Consumers are misinformed about what they are buying. Some brands and sellers, many of whom sell online and direct-to-consumer, often intentionally and illegally market high-powered devices, such as “e-motos,” as e-bikes. As a result, consumers mistakenly buy devices that require registration, insurance, and a driver’s license, or that exceed a rider’s abilities (e.g., acceleration, top speed, weight). 
  2. Consumers fail to perform due diligence when purchasing devices. Even with adequate disclosures from sellers, some consumers—including parents—fail to consider the rider’s maturity and skills when purchasing a device. 
  3. Local municipalities, land managers, and other organizations fail to communicate effectively which devices are allowed in the public right-of-way. Local and state governments should, but do not always, clearly communicate through multiple channels (e.g., maps, trail signage) which devices are allowed on roads, bike lanes, sidewalks, bicyclist and pedestrian paths, and trails.
  4. Riders often fail to research where they are permitted to ride. Even with sufficient communication from local governments, some riders fail to seek out information on where they can operate their devices. 
  5. Some people knowingly disregard laws. Despite a strong legal framework and robust communication and education, some people choose to violate the law.

2026-2027 Strategies

Improving safety will require multiple strategies and a collaborative, community-wide effort involving local businesses, schools, non-profits, and government. There is no silver bullet. 

Bicycle Colorado is well positioned to lead statewide policies and programs and to support and amplify local efforts. We will also support federal work as requested and as bandwidth allows. Our 2026-2027 strategies are organized into three categories: State Laws and Local Policies, Knowledge, and Accountability. 

One important note: We strongly believe physical infrastructure, such as bicyclist and pedestrian paths, bike lanes, signs, and lighting, profoundly affects whether people remain safe. In fact, expanding bike and safe streets infrastructure is included in our long-term strategic plan, and we’ve focused on it over the decades; however, because this is a shorter-term plan and infrastructure improvements tend to take longer, you will not see infrastructure in this plan.

Pass State Laws And Local Policies

Timeline: May 2026-May 2027 

Rationale:

The rise in use of high‑powered electric devices (i.e., “e-motos”) has created real safety and regulatory problems. These devices are not class 1, 2, or 3 e-bikes, and they don’t clearly fit the statutory definitions of other road vehicles in Title 42, such as a “motor vehicle,” “low-powered scooter,” or “motorcycle.” Although some high-powered electric devices fit the definition of an “off-highway vehicle” in Title 33, many do not. The result is a class of vehicle that cannot be lawfully registered and yet is not clearly prohibited. This lack of clarity creates confusion—many people incorrectly believe they are buying or riding an e-bike. 

Solution:

Key components of the bill include defining high-powered electric vehicles in state law, clarifying where these devices can be operated, and creating a pathway for qualifying devices to be legally operated on public roads. Additional details on this bill are available here.

Bicycle Colorado is also evaluating the following concepts for the 2027 legislative session, which could result in a second bill:

  • Mandatory helmet use for all riders under 18 on traditional and e-bikes.
  • Expand the 16-year-old class 3 e-bike age minimum to include class 2 e-bikes.
  • Require online and brick-and-mortar retailers to provide standardized safety education materials to everyone purchasing an e-bike. 


As mobility devices continue to evolve, we are also broadly evaluating e-bike and micro mobility statutory definitions and regulations and exploring ideas to advance rider and driver education both in schools and through the driver’s education and testing process. These concepts may comprise a bill in 2028 or beyond. 

Success Metric:

At least one new law is passed that promotes e-bike and ”e-moto” safety and does not undermine the benefits of legal e-biking (i.e., avoid a New Jersey-type law). 

Supporting Resources:

Pro/Con Analysis of a Mandatory Helmet Law for Youth

Timeline: June 2026-December 2027

Rationale:

Over the past year, several local governments have adopted ordinances to address “e-motos” and improve e-bike safety. Other towns and cities are discussing local ordinances. As with state legislation, these ordinances should promote safety without unnecessarily restricting access to legal e-bikes; not all draft ordinances do this. 

Solution:

Our team will:

  1. Publish guidelines to help local governments adopt quality ordinances (November  15).
  2. Provide technical assistance directly to local governments (Through 2027).
  3. Collaborate with local advocates to effect changes to local ordinances (Through 2027).
Success Metric:

All local ordinances complement state law, promote safety, and do not restrict access to legal e-bikes. 

Supporting Resources:

Sample of feedback provided to a local government. 

Disseminate Knowledge

Timeline: October 2026-December 2027

Rationale:
  • E-bikes differ from traditional bikes in acceleration, top speed, and weight, so they require specialized education. 
  • E-bike safety training materials exist; however, we haven’t found a course that fully meets market needs: some courses are cost-prohibitive, too long, lack essential content, or don’t resonate with youth. These limitations result in low completion rates.
  • Some combination of incentives is typically required to drive demand. Our course’s technical design will enable us to partner with organizations that want to incentivize completion. For example, a school could require students to complete the course to receive a bike parking permit, and Bicycle Colorado could easily track completion rates to help the school issue them.
Success Metrics:
  • A new e-bike training course is released to the public by June 1, 2027
  • 500 individuals complete the course by December 31, 2027.

Timeline: Ongoing 2027

Rationale:

There is a growing body of quality materials (e.g., videos, social media posts, digital and print flyers, trail signs) that educate the public on a range of topics related to “e-motos” and e-bikes, such as choosing the best e-bike for the rider, where devices are allowed, and safe riding behaviors. This strategy focuses on identifying the highest quality materials and making them easily accessible to the public. We will curate or create the highest quality public service announcement materials from across the country and share them with communities in Colorado. Collaborate with other organizations, including state agencies such as the Colorado Department of Transportation, the Colorado Energy Office, and school districts to create and distribute these materials.

Success Metrics:
  • Resource library is published on Bicycle Colorado’s website.

Timeline: Meetings will be held in December, March, June, and September

Timeline: Meetings will be held in December, March, June, and September

Hold People Accountable

Timeline: August 2026-Spring 2027

Rationale:

Many consumers—including parents—are led to believe they are buying an e-bike when the device is closer to a motorcycle. 

Success Metrics:
  • Attorney General issues a Consumer Alert to help Coloradans differentiate between legal e-bikes and e-motos before they buy or ride one (Dec 31, 2026).
  • Consumer protection investigators from the Attorney General’s office examine the online retailers most responsible for mislabeling and selling e-motos as e-bikes to Colorado consumers. Course corrections are implemented by the top offenders (Q1:2027).
Supporting resources:

August 2026 Letter to Attorney General

HB25-1197

Timeline: Ongoing 2027

Rationale:

Accountability matters, especially for the small segment of the population that willfully violates the law. Enforcing laws can be tricky—for example, because of public safety concerns, most officers want to avoid chasing riders who evade pursuit. Efficient, effective, and safe ways exist to hold people accountable. 

Success Metrics:

Law enforcement agencies in the top ten most populous counties in Colorado (El Paso, Denver, Arapahoe, Jefferson, Adams, Douglas, Weld, Larimer, Boulder, Pueblo) have the knowledge and resources to create a viable plan to promote e-bike and “e-moto” safety (End Q2:2027).

Conclusion

Addressing e-bike and “e-moto” safety in Colorado will take sustained effort across multiple fronts—no single law, education course, or enforcement action solves this alone. However, by pursuing strategies in each area and facilitating collaboration among governments, nonprofits, and other organizations, we believe we can keep e-bikes accessible to Coloradans while addressing the safety concerns created by high-powered devices such as “e-motos.”  This is a living plan: we will report on our progress at our quarterly webinars (December, March, June, and September), adjust our approach as we learn what works, and welcome input from local advocates, agencies, and communities along the way.

Connect With Us

Please contact us to learn more about this strategy and how we believe Bicycle Colorado is well positioned to lead on this statewide strategy for safer streets for everyone.

Peter Piccolo
Bicycle Colorado Executive Director
pete@bicyclecolorado.org